I've had so much experience with the evil of broadcasters that I bet I could write a post a day covering a different aspect of it for the rest of my time on earth. As it is, I'll just stay on the topic to pass the time and defend myself, as I save the money I need to leave this cruel place and embark on my musical career. We are wrong to think of a fool as a harmless clown. Perhaps this error comes from watching too many cartoons featuring lovable bumbling oafs. In fact, a fool is evil, for a fool has not stuff in him to be good, as wrote La Rochefoucauld. I have already stated in past posts that it takes brains to be moral; a moral person is a thinking person is how I put it. Sound moral judgement demands intellect and wisdom, while lack of intelligence calls for treachery. I've even written verses to express this point, such as the third verse of 2014's Cheater Cheater. I looked up the definition of the word fool in my computer's dictionary this morning - one of my favorite programs, by the way. A fool is a person who acts unwisely. I think broadcasters have made fools of themselves in how they treat talent, with evil consequences for the whole population. The chief folly of broadcasters, with respect to talent, as I see it, is to have presumed that they are authorities on talent when, in fact, they know nothing about talent. Talent is rare. Have the stars who stole my poems come up with any good rhyming verses of their own yet? Have they been able to pay a poet to provide them with verses of the same quality as the ones they stole from me? Did any of the newsroom writers who rhymed their news reports to mock me in 2007 dream up some new tomes like mine to help keep their comedy stars rhyming? If the broadcasters had realized that my authoring skills were rare in 2007, they'd have foreseen how a noticeable gap in their programming would grow from my authoring claims in the present. Talent is aesthetic. When did I author Linger and Orbit and Mayhem and Meat Hooks? Didn't I write these songs after someone else got paid for my first round of songs? Why did I bother to put so much effort into authoring new songs after someone else got paid for my old songs? Because I care more about beauty than I do about profits. If the broadcasters understood talent, they'd not have expected their fraud to deter me from authoring new work that might embarrass them. Talent is sexy. Before broadcasters came along and lied to the world about who wrote all my songs and blogs, I stood alone as an outstanding artist in my classroom. With no one to confuse them about who drew my drawings or who wrote my stories, the girls let me know they were attracted to me. And I wasn't very physically attractive with my broken tooth and my pimples and my funny clothes, but they just liked my talent. But broadcasters still want to credit their bullshitting cameras and dismiss my talent's appeal for the sexual successes of stars that stole my work. Talent is bestowed by nature, not by class. The broadcasters who so vehemently oppose my stardom are bigots. They think that I am unfit for fame and fortune because I am not in their exclusive club. They think talent comes from going to parties and meeting the right people. With this attitude, they stand to destroy your gifted child if you're not wealthy. Talent is sensitive. My work is more from my heart than anywhere else. Broadcasters look for it in my brain and want to think of my songs and jokes as impassive algorithms when they are essentially my love. And this love was first answered by fan love around the world. Since then, these crowds of fans have had their hearts broken by broadcasters who overlooked talent's sensitivity. Last on this incomplete list, talent is protected. While an artist like me cannot save himself from suicide, he is certainly protected from murder. I submit my own survival against whole legions of evil industry people as proof of the supreme power of copyright protection. And this protection does not make class distinctions, as do the snobs of the media. This power drags stars right out of their limousines and takes them away to jail or prison. It acts strictly according to copyright ownership, regardless of class or wealth. This is very good news for most of us, but deeply disturbing to the snobs of the corporate media. If broadcasters understood talent, they'd have been too afraid to violate my work and image. 2:00pm: I've had some time to feel the impact of this last note, in order to close it with an appropriate thought. Here is what I have to say: If you're a fraud and you don't know how to construct a solid argument to counter this, you'll probably need to resort to some kind of treachery, like lying about my dick. And if you're a fraud and you don't know how to write a hit song or how to write a good poem or how to write a good comedy script, you'll probably need to resort to some sort of treachery to tarnish my image, like lying about my dick. And that's why my dick is being lied about right now, and one day, sooner than you think, someone will knock your teeth down your throat for telling your nasty lie. As for myself, I don't need to lie about anyone's dick because I know how to construct arguments and write poems and write songs and write comedy scripts and draw cartoons. 4:06pm: We do we save slimy degenerates from drug overdoses and let brutalized authors get thrown to the dogs? All those criminal creeps who plagiarized me were safely locked up in 2007 until I erased my online accounts. Then they were released from confinement to stab me with their damn syringe. So much for heroism. Heroin seems to matter more around here. 5:18pm: I've added a few more links above to help support this argument. And don't worry, I'll finance my real music if the industry only wants to push their pets on us. 7:50pm: I thought of another aspect of talent that broadcasters don't seem to know, talent is intellectual. While a song may come from the heart, intellect is required to refine it into a pleasing work. That may be why music and literature is called intellectual property. And to put my intellectual property into the hands of cretins as they did is, I think, utterly ruinous. Broadcasters, these fans of your trendy new four-letter pet bands, like DUMM, are pretty handy with a spray can, eh? Do you also agree with their genocidal policy towards squirrels and crows? That's what I get for drawing and posting cartoons, right? I just want you to know the kind of people who are on your side. I heard they're still laughing on the way here. They must have sniffed some good glue. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
© 2017. Statements by David Skerkowski. All rights reserved. |
Sunday, July 9, 2017
Folly's Fallout
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment